Choosing the Right Project Delivery Method: A Comprehensive Guide to Choosing Which is Right For Your Project

Embarking on a retail, restaurant, or medical office expansion project can be a daunting task. Selecting the right project delivery method and contract structure is crucial for success. In this blog, we will explore various project delivery methods, their pros and cons, and when to use them.

Design-Bid-Build (DBB): DBB is suitable for straightforward projects with well-defined scopes, minimal design changes, and when the owner is comfortable with a more extended project duration.

DBB Pros:

  • Clear separation of responsibilities between designer and contractor.
  • Competitive bidding process can result in lower construction costs.
  • Owner has more control over the design process.

DBB Cons:

  • Longer project duration due to sequential design and construction phases.
  • Risk of adversarial relationships between the designer and contractor.
  • Increased potential for disputes and change orders due to design errors or omissions.

Design-Build (DB): DB is appropriate for projects requiring a fast-tracked schedule, when the owner is willing to delegate design control, and when a collaborative approach is desired.

DB Pros:

  • Single point of responsibility for design and construction reduces owner’s risk.
  • Improved collaboration between design and construction teams.
  • Faster project delivery due to overlapping design and construction phases.

DB Cons:

  • Limited owner control over the design process.
  • Less transparent pricing due to the absence of a competitive bidding process.
  • Potential for design compromises to meet budget constraints.

Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR): CMAR is best suited for complex projects where cost certainty is essential, and the owner prefers a collaborative approach between the design team, construction manager, and themselves.

CMAR Pros:

  • Early involvement of the construction manager provides cost and scheduling input.
  • Enhanced collaboration between design and construction teams.
  • Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) reduces owner’s risk of cost overruns.

CMAR Cons:

  • More complex contract structure.
  • Potential for conflicts of interest between the construction manager and owner.
  • May not achieve the lowest construction costs due to reduced competitive bidding.

Why Choose for Flat Fee Project Management or Turnkey Design Build?

  • Flat Fee Project Management: With Flat Fee Project Management, you can rest assured that your project will be managed efficiently and effectively. Our team of experts will oversee your project from start to finish, ensuring that it is completed on time and within budget. Unlike other delivery methods that involve hidden fees or percentage-based costs, our Flat Fee Project Management service provides transparency and predictability, allowing you to allocate resources confidently and without any surprises.
  • Turnkey Design-Build: Turnkey Design-Build service takes the stress out of your expansion project by managing all aspects of design and construction. Our experienced team will handle everything from site selection and permitting to construction and final inspection. This all-inclusive approach not only simplifies the process for you, but it also reduces the risk of delays and cost overruns that can occur when working with multiple contractors.

In conclusion, understanding the pros and cons of different project delivery methods is essential to selecting the right one for your retail, restaurant, or medical office expansion project. By choosing a Flat Fee Project Management approach or Turnkey Design-Builds, you can trust that your project is in the hands of experienced professionals dedicated to delivering outstanding results. Experience the benefits of transparency, predictability, and a streamlined all-inclusive process by partnering with SCGWest today.

Construction Project Management
We're Proud to Announce That We're

No. 307

on the Annual Inc. 5000 List!